Accessibility Tools

80% of our schools grow at least one performance band on their state report cards after one year.

Empowering school leaders nationwide — Join the movement today!

Unlock instructional excellence with expert coaching —Book a session now!

Results from Past Projects and
Sample Reports

The Impact Team provided intensive professional learning in literacy for ILT members on pedagogical practices, unit planning, and weekly formative assessments. 2024-25 CMAS Results showed:

  • 7/9 schools improved CMAS Literacy Median Growth Percentile by an average of 8 points

Over two years of working with eight schools in a school district in Colorado

  • 3/8 moved up one band on the School Performance Framework
  • 2/8 moved up two bands on the School Performance Framework
  • 2/8 stayed in the same performance band on the School Performance Framework, but grew in points

Cohort Group Interim Data

IMPACT

Team Cohort vs Control Group

Impact Team District Cohort Schools Interim 1 On Track Results ELA 2023/2024 CMAS ELA Plus/Minus On Track
School #1 49% 32% +17
School #2 32% 13% +19
School #3 41% 19% +22
School #4 38% 11% +27
School #5 67% 60% +7
District Control Group Schools Interim 1 On Track Results ELA 2023/2024 CMAS ELA Plus/Minus On Track
School #1 82% 75% +7
School #2 80% 75% +4
School #3 71% 58% +13
School #4 75% 82% +7
School #5 67% 60% +17

Partner District 2024-25 Literacy Interim % Correct

Interim #1 – October 2024
Interim #2 – March 2025
Collaborative 7 EASI Grant Awarded Schools*
40%
48%
Similar Schools (demographically & geographically)
27%
37%
*Partnering with The Impact Team beginning May 2024

Florida Elementary School

TRANSFORMATIONAL ENGAGEMENTS

Below are selected examples of transformational engagements with schools and districts within and beyond Colorado.

Context: The Impact Team partnered with a Network within an urban school district. The network included a range of high-, average-, and low-performing schools. In close coordination with the principal supervisor, The Impact Team provided targeted, on-site support to six of the lowest-performing schools, while delivering instructional leadership professional learning to leadership teams across the entire Collaborative.

The six focal schools served high percentages of multilingual learners and students eligible for free and reduced lunch. Our work centered on strengthening instructional infrastructures; developing leadership capacity, establishing disciplined data cycles, and building coherent systems to accelerate student growth and stabilize performance trajectories.

Action: The Impact Team partnered with district and school leaders to build the instructional infrastructure necessary for sustained improvement. Working alongside principals and their Instructional Leadership Teams (ILTs), we strengthened leadership systems, embedded aligned coaching cycles, and developed teacher leaders’ capacity to use data routinely to inform planning and instruction.

Implementation was supported through clear benchmarks, defined monitoring structures, and consistent progress checks tied to student growth indicators. Principals received ongoing coaching and monthly professional learning focused on data analysis, strategic prioritization, and short-cycle action planning. This ensured that instructional adjustments were measurable, implementation fidelity was monitored, and leadership teams could track leading indicators of progress aligned to SPF outcomes.

Impact: The first chart below illustrates the results of the five schools that worked closely with The Impact Team, as described above. Their growth can be compared with the second chart, showing schools within the same network that did not receive onsite support but WERE part of our monthly professional learning support from The Impact Team.

Responsive CMAS ELA Table
Impact Team District Cohort Schools 2023/2024 CMAS ELA District Interim Data On Track Results ELA Progress Toward CMAS ELA Goals (plus/minus)
School #1 32% 49% +17
School #2 13% 32% +19
School #3 19% 41% +22
School #4 11% 38% +27
School #5 60% 67% +7
Non Cohort Schools
Non-Cohort Schools (These schools participated in monthly professional learning with The Impact Team, but did not receive on-site coaching support) 2023/2024 CMAS ELA District Interim Data On Track Results ELA Progress Toward CMAS ELA Goals plus/minus
School #1 75% 82% +7
School #2 75% 80% +4
School #3 58% 71% +13
School #4 82% 75% +7
School #5 60% 67% +7

ADDITIONAL IMPACT EXAMPLES

The following chart is a summary of additional schools and districts we have partnered with for significant growth.
Impact Table
MLL = multilingual learners    FRL = students receiving free & reduced lunch    SOC = students of color
Action – Our Work
Context – The Places
Impact – The Results
Leadership Coaching
  • systems implementation
  • accountability
  • co-planning
  • observation & feedback
  • ILT structures
Assessment System
  • backward planning
  • create exemplars for DDI
ILT Development
  • daily & weekly structures
  • Step Back meetings
  • observation/feedback
Additional Support
  • professional development
  • coaching
6 Elementary & 2 Middle
Colorado District
60% MLL; 45% FRL; 55% SOC
→ ES: 2/6 moved one; 2/6 moved two bands on SPF
→ MS: 2/2 moved one band on SPF
Middle School
School District, CO
96% FRL, 81% SOC
(during COVID, state comparison n/a)

→ ELA: 31% → 46% (+15%)
→ Math: 49% → 34% decrease
Elementary
Colorado
90% FRL, 81% MLL
MAP/NWEA (Year 1 progress)
→ Literacy mean MGP 22 → 57
→ Math mean MGP 41 → 61
Elementary School
Florida Public School
95% FRL, 95% SOC
→ School grade D→B; 60% ELA gains; 80% Math gains

Evidence of Impact

Across engagements, our work consistently results in strengthened instructional leadership structures, clearer instructional coherence, and measurable gains in student learning. Schools we partner with move from fragmented initiatives to aligned systems in which leadership teams use data routinely, coaching is embedded in practice, and professional learning directly informs classroom instruction. Importantly, these improvements are sustained beyond our direct involvement because capacity is built within leadership teams and teacher leaders. This pattern of sustainable improvement positions The Impact Team to serve as a trusted statewide partner for CDE’s tiered instructional transformation work.

Colorado Middle School

UIP and Progress Monitoring Goals

Instructional Infrastructure - Teacher Practice 

Math Progress Monitoring Goal

Decrease % of students scoring Below Basic by 15% from Beginning of Year to Middle of Year
assessment and total reduction of 25% by End of Year

ANet Mat

h  Data – Reduction in Lowest Performance Band

ANet Interims – ELA

Increase ELA average percent correct to 40% from A1 to A2.  Increase average percent
correct to 50% by End of Year

UIP and Progress Monitoring Goals

Literacy Progress Monitoring Goal
Increase % of students scoring Proficient by 10% from Beginning of Year to Middle of Year
assessment and total increase of 20% by End of Year

Reading Inventory Data

Assessment Data

SPF Improvement 

Two Middle Schools
After One Year With The Impact Team

Five Elementary Schools
After Two Years With The Impact Team

School 2022/23 SPF Rating
(Before The Impact Team)
2023/24 SPF Rating
(After one year with the Impact Team)
Middle School 1 Priority Improvement Improvement
Middle School 2 Priority Improvement Improvement
School 2022/23 SPF Rating 2024/25 SPF Rating
Elementary School 1 Improvement Improvement
Elementary School 2 Priority Improvement Performance
Elementary School 3 Improvement Improvement
Elementary School 4 Turnaround Improvement
Elementary School 5 Improvement Performance